Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The value of sonohysterography in detecting intracavitary benign abnormalities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic value and the usefulness of sonohysterography in the detection of uterine intracavitary benign abnormalities, compared with other diagnostic methods (transvaginal ultrasonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy). From January 2003 to December 2003, a total of 73 patients (47 premenopausal (middle age 38.9) and 26 postmenopausal women (middle age 60.5)) underwent transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) and sonohysterography (SHG), consisting of an intrauterine infusion of saline solution during transvaginal ultrasound. The women referred to our Ultrasonography Center because of intermenstrual (38) or postmenopausal bleeding (19), or an abnormal or a poorly defined endometrial interface (16) as seen as baseline ultrasonography. The findings at TVS and SHG were compared with hysteroscopy (HS). In one case, the SHG was technically impossible to perform. In premenopausal group the sensitivity of SHG had been 100% in detecting submucosal fibroids, endometrial polyps and hyperplasia and 75% in detecting normal uterus. The specificity had been always 100%. In postmenopausal group the sensitivity of SHG had been 75% in detecting submucosal fibroids, 93.8% in endometrial polyps and 100% in hyperplasia and normal uterus. The specificity had been 100% in submucosal fibroids and hyperplasia and had been 90.0 and 95.5% in endometrial polyps and normal uterus, respectively. SHG allows to obtain a precise diagnosis of benign uterine pathology and it is more accurate in the diagnosis of intracavitary abnormalities than that obtained by TVS. Preoperative use of SHG may assist in choosing the best surgical treatment for the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ml:

Millilitre

mm:

Millimetre

MHz:

Megahertz

TVS:

Transvaginal ultrasonography

SHG:

Sonohysterography

HS:

Diagnostic hysteroscopy

SE:

Sensibility

SP:

Specificity

References

  1. Reslova T, Tosner J, Resl M, Kugler R, Vavrova I (1999) Endometrial Polyps. A clinical study of 245 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 262:133–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein SR, Zellster I, Horan CK, Snyder JR, Schwartz LB (1997) Ultrasonography-based triage for perimenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:102–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fleisher AC, Gordon AN, Entman SS (1989) Transabdominal and transvaginal sonography of pelvic masses. Ultrasound Med Biol 150:150

    Google Scholar 

  4. Granberg S, Wikland M, Karlsson B, Norstrom A, Friberg L (1991) Endometrial thickness as measured by endovaginal ultrasonography for identifying endometrial abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 164:47–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Naro E, Bratta FG, Romano F, Caradonna F, Loizzi P (1996) The diagnosis of benign uterine patology using transvaginal endohysterosonography. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 23(2):103–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farquhar C, Ekeroma A, Furness S, Arroll B (2003) A sistematic review of transvaginal ultrasonography, sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for the investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding in premenopausal women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(6):493–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamou J, Salat-Baroux J, Henrion R (1985) Hysteroscopie et microcolpohysteroscopie. Encycl Med Chir (Paris) Gynecologie 72(B10):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conoscenti G, Meir YJ, Fisher Tamaro L (1995) Endometrial assessment by transvaginal sonography and histological findings after D&fC in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 6:108–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Develioglu OH, Bilgin T, Yalcin OT, Ozalp S (2003) Transvaginal ultrasonography and uterine artery Doppler in diagnosing endometrial pathologies and carcinoma in postmenopausal bleeding. Arch Gynecol Obstet 268:175–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Richmann TS, Viscomi GN, de Cherney A (1984) Fallopian tubal patency assessed by ultrasound following fluid injection. Radiology 152:507–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berridge DL, Winter TC (2004) Saline infusion sonohysterography: technique, indications, and imaging findings. J Ultrasound Med 23(1):97–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldstein SR (2004) Menorrhagia and abnormal bleeding before the menopause. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18(1):59–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. ACOG (2004) Saline infusion sonohysterography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 84(1):95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pasrija S, Trivedi SS, Narula MK (2004) Prospective study of saline infusion sonohysterography in evaluation of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol Research 30:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuela Mistrangelo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valenzano, M.M., Lijoi, D., Mistrangelo, E. et al. The value of sonohysterography in detecting intracavitary benign abnormalities. Arch Gynecol Obstet 272, 265–268 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0016-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0016-z

Keywords

Navigation